Institutionen för systemteknik

Examination TSEA44

Results 2019

The group list consists of students that got a pass on lab0, and have asked for a group number.

Students that have started work with lab0 (and completed in some cases), but have not yet been associated with a group are

Results 2018

The group list consists of students that got a pass on lab0, and have asked for a group number.

Students that have started work with lab0 (and completed in some cases), but have not yet been associated with a group are

• You will work together with 2 other students. We take it for granted that all 3 of you put in roughly the same amount of work. Groups with only two students are allowed, but you need to be prepared for some extra work in that case.

Demonstration =    presentation of working design. We ask individual questions!

Written report =    a readable short report delivered to me as PDF typically consisting of

• Introduction
• Design, where you explain with text and diagrams how your design works
• Results, that you have measured
• Conclusions
• Appendix : All Verilog and C code. Comments!

A short report must fulfil the following criteria:

1. One paginated document, preferably in PDF
2. All sections are numbered. There is a table of contents. The code can be placed in an appendix.
3. All figures and tables are numbered. The text references to these figures/tables

Labs are (usually) approved like this:

1. DEM = a working design has been demonstrated
2. K = comments on the lab report, REP = report OK but no demo
3. OK = both demo and lab report approved

Labs are returned in Kent's office
(if there are no comments the result will only be reported here)

Results 2015

This year we will try something slightly different. First we measure the frame rate (frames per second measured from memory to memory, that is encode_image).

To get a reasonable frame rate we use the 320x240 test image wunderb.raw. Your result must of course be bit exact. Your wunderb.jpg must be the same regardless of how jpegtest has been executed. You can run it on the host computer or on your own accelerated FPGA-computer.

For the groups that achieve at least 25 fps, we use the cost as a tie breaker. The group with the lowest cost is the winner. The cost is measured by the formula

     cost = 100*((nr of LUTs)/46080 + (nr of block RAMs)/120 +
               (nr of multipliers)/120)/3,

which is just a percentage of the resources in the FPGA.

Results 2012

Results 2011

Results 2010

Results 2009

Fredrik (dafk02)	Andreas (dafk01) och Fredrik

 

Project group	Frame rate	Cost	Comment
dafk00
dafk01	6.35	41.58	Kamera och VGA är tillbaka!
dafk02		30.18	Kameran är tillbaka!
dafk03	7.45	77.24
dafk04
dafk05	5.95	75.8
dafk06
dafk07
dafk08
dafk09		78
dafk10	9.1	66.26
dafk11
dafk12
dafk13	7.58	55.78	No VLX-unit.

 

Results 2008

Figures are in Megaclockcycles for running the jpegtest program on the 400x512 testbild.raw. The numbers are from encode_image. It takes roughly 35 Mc to run the unaccelerated version on the OR1200 computer.

Tårtan	dafk35	dafk19	dafk23

 

Project group	Result (Mc) for encode_image
dafk35	0,067 (all in HW, burst from VRAM)
dafk19	9,2
dafk23	9,5
dafk21	10,9
dafk05	12,5
dafk20	12,9
dafk14	14,5

---

 

Results 2007

The winner is group dafk04 in the student category and Johan in the staff category.

 

Pos	Project group	Result (Mc) for write_raw_data
	Johan	0,1 (all in HW, burst, VRAM)
	dafk04	6,8
	dafk08	10,4
	dafk14	10,5
	dafk07	11,8
	dafk05	12,4
	dafk06	15,3
	dafk12	17,2
	dafk00	18,2
	dafk02	21,4
	dafk15	21,4

---

 

Results 2006

To take part in the competion the results must be reported before Wednesday 18/1 2007 1600. Se also News.

The winner is group dafk03 in the student category and Rizwan in the staff category.

 

Pos	Project group	Result (Mc) for write_raw_data
1	Rizwan	1,8
2	dafk03	7,4
3	dafk12	17,7
4	dafk02	29,1
5	dafk07	34,0
6	dafk11	28,0
7	dafk10	27,9

---

 

Results 2005

To take part in the competion the results must be reported before Wednesday 11/1 2006 1600.

Grattis grupp 21: Bilder från prisutdelningen.

 

Pos	Project group	Comment	HW DCT 2	New instr. 2+3	DMA 2+3+4
1	21	HW quantization	19,1	10,6	8,9
2	26	HW quantization	21,6	16,6	15,6 (est)
3	25		35,2	23,5	18,2
4	We		31,8	24,0
5	18		32,4	26,8
6	22		35,0	30,8
7	13		35,2
8	20		35,3
9	24		35,8	32,2	28,8
10	14		36,5
11	23		37,2
12	27		38,1	34,2